English translation copyright
© 2006 by Phillip A. Garver, Ep.Gn.; O.'.C.'.M.'. / O.'.C.'.P.'.
- All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission
of any of the contents or variations thereon without written
consent expressly prohibited.
The Gnostics
- di Rienzi, Michelis. Les Petites Églises.
Librairie Universelle, Paris, 1937; pp 89-94, written circa
1920.
Perhaps it is necessary to define Gnosis for non-initiates?
According to its Greek etymology, gnôsis,
signifies Knowledge; by extension, Complete Knowledge; and again
by extension, the “sublime Knowledge of nature and the attributes
of God.”
It is in this latter sense that the first Gnostics
understood Gnosis, which they also considered as being a science
superior to that of religious beliefs.
Although Gnosticism was mainly practiced at the
beginning of our era, it would be an error to believe that the
essence of gnosis is purely Christian – some have considered
it to be the philosophy of Christianity.
We find it, however, at least in its major strains,
with the Greeks, Egyptians and Jews.
According to early Gnosis, God is supernatural
and invisible and manifests by means of demigods called Eons and
it is one of these demigods, the Demiurge, who was the architect
of the Creation.
From God supreme emanated noüs (Spirit),
ennoïa (divine thought), logismos (speech) and enthymesis
(meditation).
The greatest Gnostic of ancient times was, indisputably,
Simon Magus, who wanted to purchase from Saint Peter the gift
of miracles (from which derives the term ‘simony’
used in the trafficking of sacred things).
When it comes to Christian Gnosticism, it was
manifested by Saint Paul, who abandoned it for the apostolate
that we know through Saint Clement of Alexandria, Menander, Saturninus
of Antioch, and, above all, through a certain Bardesanes of Edessa.
It was he who, being inspired by Zend-Avesta, imagined that the
famous Unknown Father of Zoroaster had begotten from his thought.
Jesus Christ, who had as a companion, the Holy Spirit from whom
was born the Eons and, from these, the syzygies, eptades, etc.
We do not follow these fantastic “pedigrees”,
any more than we delve into, along with Marcion, Syriac Gnosticism
which pretends that the divine Eon Jesus Christ could not have
taken on a material body.
Let us be content, in order to understand the
terms used in the current religion, with exposing that the Pleroma
represents heavenly perfection, Sophia, Wisdom (or the Holy Spirit)…
who were not always perfect, which is evidenced by the texts of
Bardesanes where the name Sophia is sometimes accompanied by the
name achamoth, which, to be quite honest, is evocative of an expression
a little too familiar in Montmartre and elsewhere, applied to
the distractions one can be led to by the freedom of thought!
Let us also recall that if Gnosticism was rigorously
opposed by Saint Irenaeus and Saint Epiphanus, it was defended
by Origen, Tertullian and even by Saint Augustine. But let’s
come back to our time.
The Gnostic Church had, a century ago, as its
principal protagonist, a certain Jules Doinel (an archivist in
Orléans, mundanely) and who, as the president of the Holy
Synod of the Perfect and Pure [Saint-Synode des Parfaits et des
Purs], claimed, in 1867, to have been consecrated a bishop by
the Eon Jesus.
Its doctrine rejected any relation with anti-Christian
philosophies, pantheism, magic, etc. Without ever being too numerous,
it was able to gather, most notably in the Midi region of France,
a sizeable number of faithful – enough, in any case, for
the Roman Catholic Church to have taken offense, since, in 1891,
the Holy Office solemnly condemned it for reviving the Albigensian
heresy.
We thought that Gnosticism had more or less disappeared
with Doinel, when, a few years ago, we received through some unknown
connection, a pastoral letter from His Grace Mgr. Synésius,
primate of the Gnostic Church, upon the occasion of his election
to the primacy. We thought it would be of interest to reproduce
here this curious document, since it seems to establish a new
priestly hierarchy and to reveal an unexpected apostolate:
Dearest Brothers and Associates,
“Even if I did not go into the vineyard of the divine
Master until the last hours, here I find myself, by your wishes
and by the Will of the Holy Pleroma, elevated to the supreme rank
of the Gnostic hierarchy. I is, I’d like to believe, more
for my religious zeal than my doctrinal knowledge that you have
thought to cast your votes for me, and I imagine that it was my
experience in life more than my evangelic piety which caused me
to become your choice.
So heavy for my feeble hands is the task which has befallen me,
all the more because the following day I will take possession
of the primatial functions of an apostolate which has caused turmoil
in the souls and which would certainly have discouraged them if
we did not all have the unshakeable conviction that the work of
God is accomplished despite all human weakness.
You help me, my dear associates, to heal the gaping wound
that our emerging Church bears in her side, by fraternally gathering
around your pastor under the radiant aegis of the mystic Tau,
in tightening once again, if possible, the links of harmony and
love which unite us, and by increasing the public apostolic works.
As concerns me, I solemnly promise, before you all, to live
and die in the Gnostic Faith and to give my life to its dissemination
throughout the world.
Dearest Brother and Sister in the Eon Christos, to forget
the woes of the present, we have only to turn our gaze upon the
Holy Mountain where our Albigensian brothers cemented with their
blood, flowing like streams, and with their flesh, so cruelly
tortured, the sublime beliefs which constitute our Religion. This
example should be a precious reassurance to our sickened hearts.
In this, dearest Brothers and Associates, I pray that the
Holy Pleroma fill you with its favors and gifts and give you the
grace to keep your Faith in the Most Holy Gnosis.”
This letter was accompanied by a convocation planned as follows:
For these reasons, I convoke, this up-coming Sunday, February
2, in my provisional primatial residence, at 17 rue des Martyrs,at
8 o’clock in the morning, the Sophia, the Bishops, and Deacons
(both male and female), Perfecti (both male and female), currently
residing in Paris, for the purpose of assisting me in the Holy
Sacrifice which I must celebrate in order to draw forth the benediction
of the Most Holy Pleroma upon our Church. I encourage all those
bishops who may not be able to be among us to also celebrate the
Holy Sacrifice, for the same intentions, in their own chapels.
I also announce that a Gnostic catechism shall be forthcoming
and which will be distributed to all who are zealous in our work;
and, for this publication, I call upon all the light of my dearest
Associates.
Given in Montségur, under the Tau, this 4th day of
the 1st month of the 7th year of the Restoration of the Gnosis.
SYNÉSIUS, Gnostic Primate
As one might have guessed, we did attend this unforeseen convocation.
The provisional residence of Mgr. Synésius was on the
4th floor of a respectable bourgeois house which housed a literary
Review whose name has escaped us. We were greeted by a young catechumen
with a Greek profile who led us into a half-lit where there were
already a dozen people present. Among them, we noticed a lady
with white hair whose accentuated characteristics were quasi-masculine
and upon whose head was an ornate sort of diadem in the center
of which glistened a metallic T (the Tau).
There was no ornamentation to speak of upon the walls. At the
back of the room, a large table covered with a blindingly white
cloth with neither lace nor embroidery. Two candles kept watch
upon the Gospel – that according to Saint John, the grand
patron of the Gnostic Church.
Near 9 o’clock, a door opened along the side of the room
and an individual we thought we recognized appeared: short in
stature, slightly stooped, a handsome head akin to the apostles
of ancient times, with a long salt-and-pepper beard, but modernized
by a pair of glasses sitting astride a fine aquiline nose, he
resembled, with his mitre and despite his thick glasses, the saints
one sees depicted in medieval stained glass windows. He was dressed
in a black cassock to the waiste and red below. On his breast
hung the famous Tau from a violet cord. It was Mgr. Synésius.
The ceremony began with a short address to the faithful, in
French, followed by the Pater Noster recited while kneeling. The
“mass” (?) followed, celebrated in Greek, during which
the bishop turned toward the assistants and urged them to publicly
confess their sins (as did the first Christians) before partaking
of the body and blood of the Eon Jesus.
Earlier, the servant had prepared on the table a small loaf
of bread and a champagne flute in which glittered the ruby of
a consecrated wine. As a sort of incense, a piece of papier d’Arménie
slowly burned on a plate.
No one, except the celebrant and his assistant, communed that
day.
When we were able to reach Mgr. Synésius after the ceremony,
our memory became clear: the Gnostic bishop was none other than
the poet F. des E., author of Humanité, a commensal of
Victor Hugo, and who, a few years earlier, had welcomed us into
the house of the Master.
It was through him that we learned of the Gnostic religion containing
only three sacraments : the imposition of hands (the manner of
baptism used by the Albigensians) ; the breaking of bread in communion,
or the symbolic sacrifice during which the astral body of the
Eon Jesus descends, and, finally, the Grace, which only the patriarch
may dispense.
The Church has an entire hierarchy: prelates, priests, deacons.
It is from among these last that the earthly Sophia, symbolizing
the soul of the Universe, is chosen. Gnostic bishops reside in
Toulouse, Béziers, Avignon, and Milan. As for the Patriarch,
the supreme head, his Episcopal Seat is in Montségur…
Mgr. Synésius spoke with us at some length about Eunoïa
become God, of hylics dedicated to the predominance of the flesh,
of psychics and pneumatics who communicate with the Paraclete,
so well that when we left the « episcopal residence, »
we were not sure if we had dealt with a visionary, an enlightened
being or simply a poet drowning in the depths of metaphysics!